Names
Introduction
Browse Names
Advanced Search
Popularity
Namesakes
Name Days
Submitted Names
Interact
Message Boards
Polls
Predict Rankings
Submit a Name
Tools
Random Renamer
Name Translator
Meanings
Anagrams
Baby Name Expert
Surname Site
Place Name Site
Menu
Sign In
Register
Surname Site
Place Name Site
Introduction
Browse Names
Advanced Search
Popularity
Namesakes
Name Days
Submitted Names
Message Boards
Polls
Predict Rankings
Submit a Name
Random Renamer
Name Translator
Meanings
Anagrams
Baby Name Expert
Sign In
Register
View Message
Home
»
Message Boards
»
All Messages
◄
Prev
►
Next
New Post
Search
Any time
Advanced
Help
[Facts] Re: Germanic name suffix not noted (archaic) ?
by
Mike C
6/11/2002, 2:39 AM
in reply to
a message by John Hausmann
The -us suffix is meant to make the names look more "Latin". Baptismal records might list the name as Wilhelmus or Henricus but he would have likely used
Wilhelm
or
Henrik
in everyday conversation.
Reply
1
Messages
Compact replies
▾
full-text
compact
Newest first
▾
newest
active
votes
oldest
Germanic name suffix not noted (archaic) ?
·
John Hausmann
·
6/10/2002, 9:07 PM
•
Re: Germanic name suffix not noted (archaic) ?
·
Mike C
·
6/11/2002, 2:39 AM
•
Re: Germanic name suffix not noted (archaic) ?
·
Barb
·
6/11/2002, 8:49 PM