Do I get a point for this, Mike? :)
Just a small correction to your FAQ on juniors..."The Junior must be the child of the parent, not a grandson or granddaughter."******Okay."The names must be exactly the same, including the middle name."******Okay."The parent must still be living. Once the parent dies the Junior becomes a 'II'."******Nuh-uh. At least, not according to the etiquette books I was brought up on. :) A "Junior" never becomes a "II" when his father dies -- he simply drops the "Jr." appellation. It is a "III" who becomes a "Jr." or a "II" when the original name-bearer dies. The reason why one "moves up" in numbering, is because numeral appellations are neither inherited nor permanent -- unless you happen to be royalty. :)"II is used whenever any ancestor, including for example a grandfather or a great-uncle, shares the same name as the child."******Okay.-- Nanaea
vote up1vote down

Messages

Junior vs. II  ·  Arthur  ·  5/31/2001, 3:17 PM
Re: Junior vs. II  ·  Arthur  ·  6/1/2001, 2:48 PM
How its done in Cyprus  ·  Pavlos  ·  6/1/2001, 3:00 AM
Re: How its done in Cyprus  ·  Phyllis  ·  6/1/2001, 9:37 PM
Re: Junior vs. II  ·  Mike C  ·  5/31/2001, 4:31 PM
Hehe, I see you have a link with the Kabalarians :P (n/t)  ·  Pavlos  ·  6/1/2001, 2:39 AM
Re: Junior vs. II  ·  Daividh  ·  5/31/2001, 9:48 PM
Errata in the last paragraphI  ·  Daividh  ·  5/31/2001, 10:30 PM
Do I get a point for this, Mike? :)  ·  Nanaea  ·  5/31/2001, 5:29 PM
Sure, I'll add it to the total  ·  Mike C  ·  5/31/2001, 10:16 PM
Re: Sure, I'll add it to the total  ·  Nanaea  ·  5/31/2001, 10:25 PM
Oops, amendment....  ·  Nanaea  ·  5/31/2001, 8:43 PM
Re: Junior vs. II  ·  Nanaea  ·  5/31/2001, 3:46 PM