View Message

New Post
Search
Help
Archives
Re: No, it's fact that Babynames.com isn't to be trusted
by Mike C
8/2/2005, 11:42 AM
in reply to a message by Chrisell
I think his point is that there are less inflamatory ways to describe the site.
Reply
vote up2vote down

Messages

azriel and zariel  ·  Brittany Smith  ·  7/28/2005, 8:02 PM
•Re: azriel and zariel  ·  Miss Claire  ·  7/29/2005, 8:00 AM
•Re: azriel and zariel  ·  Chrisell  ·  7/28/2005, 8:12 PM
•Also: Babynames.com is crap when it comes to accurate meanings. nt  ·  Miranda  ·  7/28/2005, 11:58 PM
•Re: Also: Babynames.com is crap when it comes to accurate meanings. nt  ·  Cleveland Kent Evans  ·  7/29/2005, 10:38 AM
•No, it's fact that Babynames.com isn't to be trusted  ·  Miranda  ·  7/29/2005, 2:52 PM
•Re: No, it's fact that Babynames.com isn't to be trusted  ·  Serafina Starstrider  ·  7/29/2005, 7:20 PM
•Re: No, it's fact that Babynames.com isn't to be trusted  ·  Chrisell  ·  7/29/2005, 7:23 PM
•Re: No, it's fact that Babynames.com isn't to be trusted  ·  Mike C  ·  8/2/2005, 11:42 AM
•Re: No, it's fact that Babynames.com isn't to be trusted  ·  Cleveland Kent Evans  ·  8/6/2005, 8:30 AM