View Message

Which 5 vintage, classic or “outdated” baby names for boys and girls do you think should make a comeback? Why?
As the title says, I’m curious! List five for each gender if you wish.“You see, you can’t please everyone, so you got to please yourself.”
Ricky Nelson, “Garden Party”My PNL's, you're free to peek and rate: https://www.behindthename.com/pnl/252617
Names I LOVE list: https://www.behindthename.com/pnl/252617/168616

Replies

Girls:
Jane/Janet, Donna, Kathleen, Suzanne, and Marianne.
Boys:
Coy, Luther, Benedict, Ned (not necessarily as a full name; I think it should get a resurgence as a nickname, too), and Aloysius.
The "why" is pretty boring. Its either because I like them or wouldn't mind seeing them.Flint - I like nature/gemstone names. Its
Archibald - Archie reached the charts so why not the full form?
Oswald - Same category as Desmond and Edward, just sounds a bit older.
Ozzie - Its cute and coincides with Oswald.
Ollie - Its cute and coincides with Oliver.Dorothea - If Dorothy can come back, so can this.
Felice - Fresher than Felicia, which people are tired of.
Noel - It's always been popular for boys, but dropped for girls. Noelle is also popular, so why not Noel for girls?
Euphemia - I used to dislike it but now it has a special place in my heart. I don't really like its nicknames, but Effie is tolerable. The strong-willed Dreamgirls character comes to mind. That's a positive association for me.
Casimira - Beautiful and rare, but not something I'm likely use in real life. So, it wouldn't hurt me to see it on other people's daughters/
Richard
Anthony
Gregory
Jonathan
IanMartha
Helen
Irene
Anne
Susannah
I agree about Susannah, although I prefer Susanna. I also like Susanne. It's grown on me.