Alright, allow me to explain it best I can from my own opinion, experience and observations:
When you have a longer name that has 1 or more standard nicknames, it allows that child to have the chance to have several options for personal expression and self identity. An option barred to the shorted named people such as myself growing up. I could be
Grace or
Gracie and that was it. My elder sister
Christina experimented with a variety of nicknames growing up. In her lifetime thus far at nearly 30 she's been
Christina,
Christine,
Chrissy,
Christy,
Christa,
Chris,
Tina and Teeny. All derived from 1 single longer given name that allowed her that chance of personal expression and experimentation with age and life stages until she settled on the name she most identified with as an adult. My younger sister as well who has a notable 2 part name but opts for a nickname derived from 1 of her 2 in her day to day life, but she still goes by both in professional settings.
I adore longer names. They give me life and I am always pleased in some capacity of a fanciful longer choice IRL. But we are not always "that person" 100% of the time and different names can be used in different settings. I love
Elisabeth but it seems so formal to call a baby girl that in full. So grownup and formal for an informal time period. As a baby, maybe she is
Libby, but her parents feel
Libby is too informal for a legal name. Maybe they transition her to
Elisabeth by grade school aged and out of early childhood. Sometimes names only serve us for a time in our lives but aren't suited for the entire lifetime for this or that reason.
Bobby isn't good for a grown man but
Robert is. Maybe those parents did decide to just go with
Libby instead but
Libby doesn't identify with
Libby later on and she wishes she could have been
Elisabeth or
Betty or
Eliza instead.
Elisabeth has options.
Libby does not.
Michael has options.
Mike does not. Do you understand what I mean?
What's more, for myself, I love a common nickname because it is more pedestrian and safer. If I used
Seraphina and called her
Sara for instance,
Seraphina being heard In a crowd would be very distinct and memorable but
Sara is very ordinary. I favor common nicknames very much in part because it is safe to be one in a crowd in public settings. Whereas privately or when they are older they can opt for the more distinct option. I love a long and unusual name but I don't want any stranger on the street getting wind of my hypothetical 5 year old's legal name.
Nicknames are also a way to communicate informality and kinship. My friend
Elizabeth goes by
Elizabeth in full with people she doesn't know well but I and several others she is close with call her "Bethy" when expressing affection. It's a way to express "I love you, I like you, I feel close to you" in a way formal legal names can't always express. If one has a more nicknamey legal name it doesn't always feel comfortable for strangers to call you by it. It allows for some social distance and formality on the flip side of things.
Also, I know you keep saying it isn't a judgment but your choice of wording and repeated usage makes it does in fact sound like a cultural judgment. Just so you know: just because a cultural practice is different than yours doesn't mean it's wrong or incorrect. I truthfully and honestly see no downside to the practice other than your own annoyance which doesn't concern me.
Please rate my "Names I would Use" list & "Backup Favorites" list. Feel free to rate some of my other lists too if you have the time.
https://www.behindthename.com/pnl/223226/138473This message was edited 3/6/2022, 11:28 AM