Hunter or Indigo?
for a boy. Not a real child, so don't tell me about trendiness or popularity, etc.
Just pick one. Go. :)
Just pick one. Go. :)
Replies
Indigo!
Hunter is so violent, I've never been a fan. Where as Indigo nn Indy is awesome.
Hunter is so violent, I've never been a fan. Where as Indigo nn Indy is awesome.
I like both but prefer Indigo
:)
:)
Indigo!
The more I say it, the more I like it. It's neat. :D
The more I say it, the more I like it. It's neat. :D
Indigo, no contest! I really dig it.
f
f
Hunter
Indigo
Indigo.
It's so much nicer, and Hunter only makes me think of hunting, which is obviously not good.
I also dislike the way Hunter sounds. Indigo seems to flow a little more.
It's so much nicer, and Hunter only makes me think of hunting, which is obviously not good.
I also dislike the way Hunter sounds. Indigo seems to flow a little more.
This message was edited 2/20/2010, 4:00 PM
Hunter!
Hunter. I prefer Indigo for a girl.
Indigo
I hate the name Hunter with a passion. Its just so violent sounding and such an unpleasant thing to name a child for. Indigo is kind of boho-cool. Its soft but edgy...I actually like it a whole lot for a boy.
I hate the name Hunter with a passion. Its just so violent sounding and such an unpleasant thing to name a child for. Indigo is kind of boho-cool. Its soft but edgy...I actually like it a whole lot for a boy.
Hunter
Indigo. I like the sound and the feel, and it's a cool color :P and Hunter is a bit bleah / bland sounding. Indigo would be a cool and interesting person; Hunter would be an average, mean-ish sort of person.
Hunter. Neither is my style, but Indigo is too hippy for me. Hunter is at least a real name, originally a last name, but still a name.