Re: Gee, I guess you're right... (M)
in reply to a message by Marla
1. There are plenty of names you can give a child that aren't in the top few hundreds and still aren't as ludicrous as Beowulf.2. If a child is going to stand out and be extraordinary, he or she will do so regardless of their name. The most outstanding children in my class (I'm a teacher) are named Toby, William, Zoe, Shelby and Holly - all Top 100 names.I do feel sorry for children whose parents place ridiculous assumptions and expectations on their children, and particularly when they base those assumptions solely on the name they've bestowed on the child. It's unfair on the child and immature of the parent to do so. Names are just labels. They don't create character.This is an opinions board. You are going to get negative opinions, particularly if you hyperactively champion over-the-top names. If you can't take the heat . . . etc.
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Messages

OMG! The raddest twins EVER!  ·  Marla  ·  6/4/2008, 10:38 PM
Re: OMG! The raddest twins EVER!  ·  anon  ·  6/5/2008, 10:30 PM
Ummmmm, right. Not seeing the "rad-ness" of this set. (m)  ·  Pink Princess  ·  6/5/2008, 8:00 PM
Those are certainly bold choices. /nt  ·  Lillian  ·  6/5/2008, 7:56 PM
X's response  ·  Siri  ·  6/5/2008, 3:47 PM
Re: X's response  ·  Marla  ·  6/5/2008, 4:52 PM
Beowulf?  ·  August Rose  ·  6/5/2008, 2:35 PM
I LOVE it, but I have one concern.  ·  Phoenix-san  ·  6/5/2008, 2:07 PM
Re: I LOVE it, but I have one concern.  ·  Marla  ·  6/5/2008, 4:50 PM
It would be cool if Lux Amadeus were a boy. nt  ·  Aileen  ·  6/5/2008, 1:36 PM
Re: OMG! The raddest twins EVER!  ·  lac  ·  6/5/2008, 11:33 AM
Re: OMG! The raddest twins EVER!  ·  Zora  ·  6/5/2008, 10:49 AM
Re: OMG! The raddest twins EVER!  ·  Dot  ·  6/5/2008, 11:44 AM
They'd be great if they were both boys. :/ nt  ·  Akua Topaz  ·  6/5/2008, 10:12 AM
Re: OMG! The raddest twins EVER!  ·  queenv  ·  6/5/2008, 9:57 AM
Re: OMG! The raddest twins EVER!  ·  number1212  ·  6/5/2008, 8:15 AM
Not sharing your enthusiasm...  ·  Amy J  ·  6/5/2008, 7:51 AM
Re: OMG! The raddest twins EVER!  ·  Jasmine  ·  6/5/2008, 7:27 AM
Oh duh! I thought they were both boys at first  ·  Kirke  ·  6/5/2008, 6:30 AM
Re: OMG! The raddest twins EVER!  ·  Wordsmith  ·  6/5/2008, 5:36 AM
Re: OMG! The raddest twins EVER!  ·  Kirke  ·  6/5/2008, 5:00 AM
Re: OMG! The raddest twins EVER!  ·  Murasaki  ·  6/5/2008, 4:49 AM
Re: OMG! The raddest twins EVER!  ·  Lotta  ·  6/5/2008, 3:13 AM
I'm torn . . .  ·  Atheling  ·  6/5/2008, 2:26 AM
Re: OMG! The raddest twins EVER!  ·  ElizainEngland  ·  6/5/2008, 2:15 AM
Dumbstruck (nt)  ·  Jonquil  ·  6/5/2008, 1:59 AM
Eeek  ·  Chrisell  ·  6/5/2008, 1:36 AM
Gee, I guess you're right... (M)  ·  Marla  ·  6/5/2008, 4:43 PM
Re: Gee, I guess you're right... (M)  ·  Chrisell  ·  6/5/2008, 5:00 PM
Re: Gee, I guess you're right... (M)  ·  Marla  ·  6/5/2008, 5:21 PM
I agree, too. (nt)  ·  Kate  ·  6/5/2008, 10:01 AM
agree  ·  mirfak  ·  6/5/2008, 8:48 AM
Re: agree  ·  Marla  ·  6/5/2008, 4:45 PM
Re: agree  ·  queenv  ·  6/5/2008, 6:52 PM
I must agree. (m)  ·  MariaNikolaievnaRomanova  ·  6/6/2008, 7:05 AM
Re: OMG! The raddest twins EVER!  ·  Laura W  ·  6/5/2008, 12:40 AM
Re: OMG! The raddest twins EVER!  ·  Sabrina Fair  ·  6/4/2008, 11:32 PM
Re: OMG! The raddest twins EVER!  ·  Sweetly Broken  ·  6/4/2008, 11:08 PM