View Message

This is a reply within a larger thread: view the whole thread

I agree
For me using "working class" and "trailer trash" for the same group of people is not okay. It is something very different to me. I've been using the word anti-social in my other post, maybe that's considered less offensive? Maybe "working class anti-socials" if you really need to make clear that they aren't rich?
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Replies

Yes, I agree as well. Working class and trailer trash is not the same thing. Working class people are not the ones who give their children weird and "trashy" names, they normally give their children very common, ordinary names like Emma and William (at least in Sweden). Trailer trash (they don't really exist in Sweden but there is a social group that can be compared to the American trailer trash) are they ones who don't work, don't educate themselves etc and live of the welfare system.
vote up1
Are all anti social people trashy? Are all trashy people anti social? I don't know...
Isn't anti-social more a mental problem? Because I don't want to be told that I attack disabled people or something... some people are so into politically correct and giving lessons... telling me the right word would have been great, but who needs moral lessons from a total internet stranger...
vote up1
I didn't want to get into this, butIt seems to me that you have the wrong definition of both trashy and anti-social. I am inclined to not be offended by a "total internet stranger" too, but I sort of am by you equating trashy and antisocial. I am antisocial, but I am most certainly not trashy, which would be a huge insult for anyone to be called. Those two words are in no way related.

This message was edited 1/16/2008, 2:50 PM

vote up1
I think we might have a language problem hereBecause in Dutch those things are definately related. Our word for trashy people is 'aso' (which comes from a-social)
maybe my other reply makes it a bit clearer what I mean:
http://www.behindthename.com/bb/view.php?id=3123671&board=baby
vote up1
I agree with this. I think they have a different connotation of anti-social, but to be "trashy" in America is completely unrelated to being anti-social. I agree that there probably isn't a suitable translation for trailer-trash becauseit is a very specific subculture to Americans with very specific connotations. Likewise, antisocial sort of just means "shy" to many Americans. Perhaps we should refer to them as "Possible Jerry Springer guests" ;P
vote up1
HonestlyTrailer-trash brings to mind a certain subculture of people, regardless of their financial status. So I don't know what the correct term to use is.*shrugs* Maybe we should just go with what Mirfak said.
vote up1
I would expect a good bashing if I said trailer trash = proletarian, personnally...
vote up1
yes -and that is, I think, the subtlety that is being lost in translation here: the term "trailer trash" can be taken to specifically denigrate trailer dwellers (code for poor). It can whether the people being described dwell in trailers, or don't, because it suggests - even if YOU don't suggest, the term can be taken to suggest - that all trailer dwellers (code for poor) are alike in their vulgarity and comparability to rubbish. So what you need to know before saying trailer trash is, it *is* classist in the US -- not in the direct way that denigrating, say, "filthy proles" would be, but in an indirect way. We all know exactly what you mean by trailer trash, so it's a useful idiom, but it sounds judgmental.I think just stating whatever fact leads you to conclude they're trailer trash - "This family appeared on a vulgar show like Jerry Springer's" - should communicate the right sort of information, without appearing to express scorn for an entire class of people.

This message was edited 1/16/2008, 1:02 PM

vote up1
YupNowhere near the same thing to me. To the other question: not all anti-socials are trashy, but all trailer trash are anti-socials (I don't think trash applies to anyone who isn't anti-social). I don't see anti-social as a mental problem, but more as a 'poor upbringing' problem. I know there are some mental problems that cause awkward social behaviour, but that isn't what I call anti-social. Anti-social is more not at all caring about others, and not, caring but not being able to have the 'correct behaviour'. (I hope it's a bit clear what I mean)
vote up1
I think I see. It's hard to get little differences in foreign languages... thanks!
vote up1