View Message

This is a reply within a larger thread: view the whole thread

[Opinions] No.
in reply to a message by Katie
Do you think someone will take a grown man seriously when he says his name is Billy or Stevie? I wouldn't-- it sounds childish and your baby won't be a baby forever. Many names, like Alexander, Zachary, and Matthew, get shortened to their nicknames automatically-- I can't tell you how many times a teacher has taken attendance in a class and come to a Matthew and asked "Do you go by Matthew or Matt?" It's only "different" nicknames that would have to be corrected (Like Xander instead of Alex, Liam instead of Will or Bill) So-- basically, no. Give them a full name and call them by a nickname if you like.
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Replies

See... Billie and Stevie weren't for boys. I don't think they sound quite so babyish on girls... especially since I'm not sure I could saddle a kid with Wilhelmina
vote up1
Eh. The fact that they're girls doesn't change a thing for me, but it might make it worse. Not only are they nicknames, but they're boyish. Your poor daughter may very well get tired of hearing "That's a boy's name." For Billie, what about Willa, Wilma, Wilda, Willemina, Willow, Bilhah or Bilyana?
vote up1
oh no - I would infinitely rather explain 'my names Billie - as in Billie Holiday' than "my names - any of the listed alternatives.....". With no offence to any of the Wilhemina's out there - but Billie is just so much nicer a name :)
vote up1
I don't really like any of those. I think Billie is pretty reasonable compared to what some girls are called now.. Plus Billie and Stevie ARE legit nicknames for girls. Even if they are used mainly on boys..

This message was edited 3/5/2008, 1:27 PM

vote up1
Agree with all of this.
vote up1