Popularity in the United States
Numbers
| Nathaniel (masculine) | |||
| Year | Rank | Percent Used | |
| 2023 | #143 | 0.137 | |
| 2022 | #138 | 0.144 | |
| 2021 | #133 | 0.150 | |
| 2020 | #125 | 0.158 | |
| 2019 | #123 | 0.161 | |
| 2018 | #116 | 0.174 | |
| 2017 | #112 | 0.179 | |
| 2016 | #103 | 0.192 | |
| 2015 | #97 | 0.207 | |
| 2014 | #94 | 0.211 | |
| 2013 | #91 | 0.224 | |
| 2012 | #84 | 0.236 | |
| 2011 | #84 | 0.245 | |
| 2010 | #81 | 0.249 | |
| 2009 | #75 | 0.256 | |
| 2008 | #77 | 0.269 | |
| 2007 | #82 | 0.274 | |
| 2006 | #69 | 0.302 | |
| 2005 | #67 | 0.314 | |
| 2004 | #68 | 0.316 | |
| 2003 | #63 | 0.317 | |
| 2002 | #62 | 0.330 | |
| 2001 | #61 | 0.321 | |
| 2000 | #61 | 0.325 | |
| 1999 | #62 | 0.317 | |
| 1998 | #60 | 0.317 | |
| 1997 | #65 | 0.289 | |
| 1996 | #69 | 0.270 | |
| 1995 | #73 | 0.259 | |
| 1994 | #78 | 0.247 | |
| 1993 | #75 | 0.235 | |
| 1992 | #79 | 0.223 | |
| 1991 | #84 | 0.206 | |
| 1990 | #85 | 0.202 | |
| 1989 | #84 | 0.197 | |
| 1988 | #82 | 0.203 | |
| 1987 | #78 | 0.208 | |
| 1986 | #78 | 0.210 | |
| 1985 | #77 | 0.208 | |
| 1984 | #80 | 0.192 | |
| 1983 | #79 | 0.195 | |
| 1982 | #75 | 0.209 | |
| 1981 | #80 | 0.200 | |
| 1980 | #86 | 0.188 | |
| 1979 | #95 | 0.170 | |
| 1978 | #94 | 0.171 | |
| 1977 | #107 | 0.146 | |
| 1976 | #114 | 0.135 | |
| 1975 | #130 | 0.121 | |
| 1974 | #153 | 0.099 | |
| 1973 | #169 | 0.086 | |
| 1972 | #192 | 0.072 | |
| 1971 | #200 | 0.067 | |
| 1970 | #218 | 0.060 | |
| 1969 | #231 | 0.054 | |
| 1968 | #235 | 0.052 | |
| 1967 | #226 | 0.055 | |
| 1966 | #235 | 0.050 | |
| 1965 | #223 | 0.057 | |
| 1964 | #235 | 0.051 | |
| 1963 | #233 | 0.050 | |
| 1962 | #234 | 0.052 | |
| 1961 | #244 | 0.049 | |
| 1960 | #239 | 0.053 | |
| 1959 | #236 | 0.053 | |
| 1958 | #234 | 0.051 | |
| 1957 | #212 | 0.058 | |
| 1956 | #205 | 0.061 | |
| 1955 | #195 | 0.064 | |
| 1954 | #203 | 0.059 | |
| 1953 | #192 | 0.063 | |
| 1952 | #189 | 0.064 | |
| 1951 | #187 | 0.065 | |
| 1950 | #182 | 0.067 | |
| 1949 | #179 | 0.066 | |
| 1948 | #180 | 0.065 | |
| 1947 | #187 | 0.059 | |
| 1946 | #186 | 0.059 | |
| 1945 | #181 | 0.062 | |
| 1944 | #183 | 0.062 | |
| 1943 | #191 | 0.058 | |
| 1942 | #188 | 0.060 | |
| 1941 | #182 | 0.066 | |
| 1940 | #176 | 0.070 | |
| 1939 | #183 | 0.068 | |
| 1938 | #186 | 0.066 | |
| 1937 | #186 | 0.064 | |
| 1936 | #179 | 0.069 | |
| 1935 | #180 | 0.070 | |
| 1934 | #174 | 0.074 | |
| 1933 | #178 | 0.071 | |
| 1932 | #176 | 0.073 | |
| 1931 | #199 | 0.062 | |
| 1930 | #185 | 0.067 | |
| 1929 | #183 | 0.069 | |
| 1928 | #193 | 0.064 | |
| 1927 | #187 | 0.066 | |
| 1926 | #176 | 0.072 | |
| 1925 | #178 | 0.070 | |
| 1924 | #179 | 0.068 | |
| 1923 | #193 | 0.064 | |
| 1922 | #175 | 0.071 | |
| 1921 | #187 | 0.066 | |
| 1920 | #166 | 0.076 | |
| 1919 | #174 | 0.074 | |
| 1918 | #193 | 0.063 | |
| 1917 | #189 | 0.067 | |
| 1916 | #194 | 0.064 | |
| 1915 | #197 | 0.063 | |
| 1914 | #185 | 0.069 | |
| 1913 | #201 | 0.063 | |
| 1912 | #163 | 0.079 | |
| 1911 | #161 | 0.086 | |
| 1910 | #139 | 0.111 | |
| 1909 | #172 | 0.081 | |
| 1908 | #159 | 0.090 | |
| 1907 | #174 | 0.078 | |
| 1906 | #177 | 0.070 | |
| 1905 | #167 | 0.082 | |
| 1904 | #174 | 0.076 | |
| 1903 | #165 | 0.081 | |
| 1902 | #189 | 0.066 | |
| 1901 | #163 | 0.080 | |
| 1900 | #176 | 0.073 | |
| 1899 | #189 | 0.063 | |
| 1898 | #175 | 0.068 | |
| 1897 | #272 | 0.035 | |
| 1896 | #206 | 0.057 | |
| 1895 | #199 | 0.057 | |
| 1894 | #192 | 0.062 | |
| 1893 | #224 | 0.048 | |
| 1892 | #196 | 0.059 | |
| 1891 | #237 | 0.042 | |
| 1890 | #178 | 0.063 | |
| 1889 | #233 | 0.040 | |
| 1888 | #221 | 0.048 | |
| 1887 | #203 | 0.052 | |
| 1886 | #220 | 0.050 | |
| 1885 | #220 | 0.047 | |
| 1884 | #221 | 0.046 | |
| 1883 | #221 | 0.044 | |
| 1882 | #217 | 0.047 | |
| 1881 | #220 | 0.044 | |
| 1880 | #200 | 0.051 | |
 |
|||