View Message

This is a reply within a larger thread: view the whole thread

I like them...
Am I the only one? xDI don't like Leone all that much and I don't like how its hyphenated but Mali is adorable. It's another Asian name (Thai) that's also a name in my native language. I really like it!
Sierra is Spanish (it says here) so okay they don't really match for origin but I love the sound of it!! It's cool. Like an awesome form of Sarah.
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Replies

I think that Sierra is just a Spanish word used as a name, starting in the US- just another word name.
vote up1
Sierra is a Spanish surname (says the internet) so not another word-name the USA turned into a name. Another last-name-turned-first-name! :D
vote up1
Then it's a geographical surname as well. http://www.spanishcentral.com/translate/sierra
vote up1
I think most people won't like them because they're names of African countries, so it seems a little insensitive to use them. Although I do know a boy who has Mali as a middle name because a friend of his parents is from there.
vote up1
They're countries as well? I didn't know (knowledge of African geography lacking!)
I guess I can see why people wouldn't like them cos of that.
But they aren't just countries and there's heaps of overlap with countries and names and things. Like it says here that Kenya is a Russian boy's name too. Do people think all country/place names are insensitive? Like are India and Paris and China and Dakota and Sahara insensitive too?
vote up1
QuoteDo people think all country/place names are insensitive? Like are India and Paris and China and Dakota and Sahara insensitive too?
I'm White British, so I can't say for certain whether they're offensive, but I think India, China and Dakota are poor and insensitive choices for white parents to make. India is a guilty pleasure name of mine, though, I must say.
vote up1
But not Paris because you're white British so Paris is okay? Or did you just not type it?
There has to be a rule to what's insensitive and what isn't and I'm trying to figure it out.Now I know Dakota is actually the name of a Native American tribe and so is Cheyenne, so now I know that I'd say they were totally insensitive cos they're races of people. That's just really weird. ESPECIALLY if your race beat up on the people your naming your kid after.
I know if I met a white kid with my ethnicity as their name I'd be like "what... the hell?" :(
And it goes both ways cos I'd never name my kids English. Or French. That would just be crazy.But I think places are more okay? Less insensitive I mean? Because a place is a place and not people. My brother has a white girlfriend named India and we never thought to be offended by it.
But if your country is having a war with the country you name your kid that probably is horribly insensitive.
vote up1
Well, if you think about it, white Europeans are the ones who colonised pretty much the entire globe and greatly mistreated its inhabitants, particularly those of different races. We still continue to oppress them and appropriate their culture to this day. But Paris was never a colonised place and the Parisians never oppressed, so I see it as different. I still think it's a silly name, but not as potentially insulting or disrespectful.
QuoteI know if I met a white kid with my ethnicity as their name I'd be like "what... the hell?" :(
Can I ask what your ethnicity is? Out of curiosity - you might have a better stand point on this than I do, as, like I say, I'm white, so I can't really decide what is and isn't offensive to other cultures.
vote up1
There's been some pretty high profile conflict in the countries the Australian children are named after in recent decades.:0)
vote up1
Ohh... I get why that mightn't be the best idea then.
Thanks for explaining :)
vote up1