New Post
Search
HelpWhy 2001?
in reply to a message by Ashley
We used 2000 for the kindergarteners (which would of been 6 & 7 year olds instead of 5 & 6 yr olds, by the way). So now the 1st graders are 5& 6? We should be using the 1999 list.
Archived Thread - replies disabled
1
Replies
That was what I was wondering, too.
1
Hmm .. I feel like an idiot :] Hahaha
Sorry about that one guys!! Next round I guess we will use 1998 as it's too late now, and most of the names are probably on the list anyways. Wow, I feel stupid :P I need more sleep.
Sorry about that one guys!! Next round I guess we will use 1998 as it's too late now, and most of the names are probably on the list anyways. Wow, I feel stupid :P I need more sleep.
1
Oh, plus [well where I live at least] kindergarteners are 5-turning-6 or already 6 during the year, so if we did it as THIS year (2006-2007) the kids are 5 or 6 years old, which is what I went off of :]
1