Re: Disgruntled about poor quality baby name books
Never heard of the gent - but in his defence you can derive Little and Womanly from it quite comfortably - Charlot being a (m) diminutive of Charles (and what Charlie Chaplin was known as in France), and the doubled consonant plus -e making it fem; so if the female form of Man is Woman, then QED.Of course, it'd be more scholarly to say Female Form Of Charles with a cross-reference. But then you might lose more readers than you'd gain; people are odd about accuracy, and about doing research for themselves. They prefer the baby bird approach: keep the beak wide open, and swallow all the worms without looking ...
vote up1vote down

Messages

Disgruntled about poor quality baby name books  ·  Melina  ·  4/8/2004, 1:30 PM
One good one  ·  Lisa K  ·  4/10/2004, 9:59 AM
Sorry, I mean "nieve", not neve. (nm)  ·  Caprice  ·  4/10/2004, 5:40 AM
Re: Disgruntled about poor quality baby name books  ·  Caprice  ·  4/10/2004, 5:39 AM
Re: Disgruntled about poor quality baby name books  ·  Lauren  ·  4/9/2004, 1:38 AM
Re: Disgruntled about poor quality baby name books  ·  Anneza  ·  4/13/2004, 12:17 AM
Re: Disgruntled about poor quality baby name books  ·  Melina  ·  4/9/2004, 2:34 PM
Re: Disgruntled about poor quality baby name books  ·  Devonelisa  ·  4/8/2004, 3:59 PM
Re: Disgruntled about poor quality baby name books  ·  beata  ·  4/8/2004, 6:18 PM
Re: Disgruntled about poor quality baby name books  ·  Melina  ·  4/9/2004, 2:38 PM
Re: Disgruntled about poor quality baby name books  ·  yo  ·  5/5/2004, 1:20 AM
Re: Disgruntled about poor quality baby name books  ·  lo  ·  5/5/2004, 1:21 AM