Message: "Re: No, it's fact that Babynames.com isn't to be trusted"

Re: No, it's fact that Babynames.com isn't to be trusted

by Cleveland Kent Evans (clevelandkentevans)

8/6/2005, 8:30 AM

Precisely. It is fine to criticize their accuracy, but "crap" is not a word that should be used on a site like this one where people are supposed to be discussing names from an intellectual perspective.

Messages

azriel and zariel · Brittany Smith · 7/28/2005, 8:02 PM

•Re: azriel and zariel · Miss Claire · 7/29/2005, 8:00 AM

•Re: azriel and zariel · Chrisell · 7/28/2005, 8:12 PM

•Also: Babynames.com is crap when it comes to accurate meanings. nt · Miranda · 7/28/2005, 11:58 PM

•Re: Also: Babynames.com is crap when it comes to accurate meanings. nt · Cleveland Kent Evans · 7/29/2005, 10:38 AM

•No, it's fact that Babynames.com isn't to be trusted · Miranda · 7/29/2005, 2:52 PM

•Re: No, it's fact that Babynames.com isn't to be trusted · Serafina Starstrider · 7/29/2005, 7:20 PM

•Re: No, it's fact that Babynames.com isn't to be trusted · Chrisell · 7/29/2005, 7:23 PM

•Re: No, it's fact that Babynames.com isn't to be trusted · Mike C · 8/2/2005, 11:42 AM

•Re: No, it's fact that Babynames.com isn't to be trusted · Cleveland Kent Evans · 8/6/2005, 8:30 AM

View Message

Messages