Message: "No, it's fact that Babynames.com isn't to be trusted"

No, it's fact that Babynames.com isn't to be trusted

by Miranda (Randee15)

7/29/2005, 2:52 PM

in reply to a message by Cleveland Kent Evans

It's notoriously unreliable, and nobody should go there if they want accurate, etymologically-based meanings. Thus, what I said was perfectly factual.

EDIT: - extra "was", two days after the fact...

Miranda
"You've been downgraded to a class three tropical storm." -- My mother to my father, re: Hurricane Dennis

Proud adopter of 15 punctuation marks; see my profile for their names.

This message was edited 8/1/2005, 2:52 PM

Messages

azriel and zariel · Brittany Smith · 7/28/2005, 8:02 PM

•Re: azriel and zariel · Miss Claire · 7/29/2005, 8:00 AM

•Re: azriel and zariel · Chrisell · 7/28/2005, 8:12 PM

•Also: Babynames.com is crap when it comes to accurate meanings. nt · Miranda · 7/28/2005, 11:58 PM

•Re: Also: Babynames.com is crap when it comes to accurate meanings. nt · Cleveland Kent Evans · 7/29/2005, 10:38 AM

•No, it's fact that Babynames.com isn't to be trusted · Miranda · 7/29/2005, 2:52 PM

•Re: No, it's fact that Babynames.com isn't to be trusted · Serafina Starstrider · 7/29/2005, 7:20 PM

•Re: No, it's fact that Babynames.com isn't to be trusted · Chrisell · 7/29/2005, 7:23 PM

•Re: No, it's fact that Babynames.com isn't to be trusted · Mike C · 8/2/2005, 11:42 AM

•Re: No, it's fact that Babynames.com isn't to be trusted · Cleveland Kent Evans · 8/6/2005, 8:30 AM

View Message

Messages