Message: "Re: you're welcome :-)" - Behind the Name

Re: you're welcome :-)

by Barbara (guest)

9/12/2002, 5:26 PM

in reply to a message by Shay

Well, the Scottish have it, don't they? Like in "loch", for example?

Messages

names that are not written · ashley · 9/10/2002, 9:21 AM

•Re: names that are not written · Anneza · 9/11/2002, 2:33 AM

•And while we're at it..... · Barb · 9/11/2002, 4:24 PM

•Furthermore: · Pavlos · 9/12/2002, 2:46 AM

•"bibical": Perhaps "having to do with bibs"? We can only assume our ashley [sic] drools a lot. It would make sense... nt · Daividh · 9/15/2002, 7:55 PM

•Perhaps it's supposed to be "biblical", but don't quote me, Oh, Greek One. n/t · Phyllis · 9/12/2002, 5:25 PM

•names that are not written · Meagan · 9/10/2002, 4:54 PM

•oh boy... · Mike C · 9/10/2002, 5:07 PM

•:-( n/t · Pavlos · 9/11/2002, 3:49 AM

•Re: names that are not written · Barbara · 9/10/2002, 2:34 PM

•Re: names that are not written · Shay · 9/11/2002, 2:53 AM

•Re: names that are not written · Barbara · 9/12/2002, 4:04 AM

•you're welcome :-) · Shay · 9/12/2002, 2:15 PM

•It does, but without being a part of a word. :rolleyes: n/t · Phyllis · 9/12/2002, 5:31 PM

•Re: you're welcome :-) · Barbara · 9/12/2002, 5:26 PM

•Re: you're welcome :-) · Phyllis · 9/13/2002, 3:46 PM