Re: Lily as a nn for Elizabeth?
Lillian was definitely a nn for Elizabeth at first: in 1279 Lilion was recorded in England. In 1296 Lylie was recorded as a diminutive of Elizabeth. (See http://snipurl.com/a2vp for both, they're the last two names.)So I don't see why Lily can't be a nn for Elizabeth, though personally I think Lily stands fine enough on its own, since its common use didn't evolve from it being a nn name.Miranda
vote up1vote down

Messages

Lily as a nn for Elizabeth?  ·  AlohaGirl  ·  11/10/2004, 9:00 AM
the queen ...  ·  perse  ·  11/11/2004, 3:46 AM
Re: the queen ...  ·  Chrisell  ·  11/11/2004, 3:17 PM
Re: the queen ...  ·  Anthony  ·  11/11/2004, 8:38 PM
Re: Lily as a nn for Elizabeth?  ·  Anneza  ·  11/10/2004, 11:57 PM
Re: Lily as a nn for Elizabeth?  ·  Miranda  ·  11/10/2004, 12:07 PM
Re: Lily as a nn for Elizabeth?  ·  Miss Claire  ·  11/10/2004, 10:38 AM
Re: Lily as a nn for Elizabeth?  ·  Kitty  ·  11/10/2004, 10:45 AM