View Message

New Post
Search
Help
Beverly for a boy?
by Amelia (guest)
2/13/2007, 6:26 PM
I know this was once popular for a boy. Anyone think it would be ok to use it today?
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Messages

Beverly for a boy?  ·  Amelia  ·  2/13/2007, 6:26 PM
•Abslutely NO! n/t  ·  Aria  ·  2/14/2007, 8:14 PM
•Alas, no  ·  Miranda  ·  2/14/2007, 5:10 PM
•Re: Beverly for a boy?  ·  gythien  ·  2/14/2007, 4:24 AM
•No way! The poor kid would be teased within an inch of his life. nt.  ·  Pink Princess  ·  2/13/2007, 10:57 PM
•What she said (m)  ·  Madrigal  ·  2/14/2007, 2:00 AM
•Absolutely not (m)  ·  lac  ·  2/13/2007, 10:49 PM
•I prefer Waverly, and think it could be pulled off better. [nt]  ·  molly  ·  2/13/2007, 9:58 PM
•Re: Beverly for a boy?  ·  RoxStar  ·  2/13/2007, 7:04 PM
•Re: Beverly for a boy?  ·  Tassiegirl  ·  2/13/2007, 7:02 PM
•Hmmm  ·  Kris Rose  ·  2/13/2007, 6:34 PM
•No.  ·  Kae  ·  2/13/2007, 6:32 PM
•no way (nt)  ·  Kristen  ·  2/13/2007, 6:30 PM
•Ditto n/t  ·  Claire  ·  2/13/2007, 7:44 PM
•yes [m]  ·  Sabrina Fair  ·  2/13/2007, 6:30 PM
•apples and oranges  ·  RoxStar  ·  2/13/2007, 7:07 PM
•Re: apples and oranges  ·  Sabrina Fair  ·  2/13/2007, 7:39 PM
•what about it?  ·  RoxStar  ·  2/13/2007, 7:49 PM
•Sidney/Sydney has been used for boys since the 17th century (m)  ·  Poppylena  ·  2/14/2007, 4:42 AM
•Yes but...  ·  Kris Rose  ·  2/13/2007, 7:12 PM
•ever notice...  ·  RoxStar  ·  2/13/2007, 7:22 PM
•Re: ever notice...  ·  Miss Julia Keelan  ·  2/14/2007, 7:37 AM
•You know...  ·  Kris Rose  ·  2/13/2007, 7:37 PM