Anyone notice that boys always seem to have slightly better names when it comes to this sort of thing? NT
in reply to a message by Sabrina Fair
Replies
Boys . . .
Are, and have always been, named out of a far smaller pool of names. Girls' names, both traditionally and in modern times, have been open to far more creativity in the way of spelling variations, shortenings, lengthenings, combinations, etc.
It's both a good and a bad thing - they're spared from the worst excesses of Kre8ibhiteigh, but they're also far more likely to find themselves as Matthew P. (or whatever) when they reach school.
♦ Chrisell ♦
All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us. - J.R.R. Tolkien.
Are, and have always been, named out of a far smaller pool of names. Girls' names, both traditionally and in modern times, have been open to far more creativity in the way of spelling variations, shortenings, lengthenings, combinations, etc.
It's both a good and a bad thing - they're spared from the worst excesses of Kre8ibhiteigh, but they're also far more likely to find themselves as Matthew P. (or whatever) when they reach school.
All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us. - J.R.R. Tolkien.