View Message

Josh is dumb, Jonathan and David are common but good. Also 2 J's and one D doesn't work for me.

---

I'd 'fix' the triplets by switching Josh with any common, 'respectable' but unremarkable name with no particular age that doesn't start with J or D:
Adam, Alexander, Mark, Nicholas, Benjamin, Colin, William, Charles, Lucas, Frederick, Simon, Silas, Anthony, Oliver, Michael, Milo, Felix, Ethan, Gavin, Victor, Edward, Roderick, Thomas, Theodore, Bennett, Harry, Kent, Noah, Peter...

This message was edited 10/20/2023, 3:34 PM

Boring

Joshua is better. I also think it would be better if they all started with J or better yet, each started with another letter.

I prefer Joshua and change one of the J names to another letter, Jonathan and David are nice

Josh is the odd name out. Another biblical name, as long as it wasn't too unusual, would have worked better. Not a J name, so not even Joshua; not a D name, so not Daniel. Michael would work for me: another good, mainstream name with pleasant nns if necessary. I've never found Jonathan very appealing, a bit flabby in fact, but it's OK, and David is my son's mn, so that's fine too.

Joshua is preferable, but dont really see anything wrong with the set. Don't really understand obsessions with initials, these are handsome names.

I think Josh and Jonathan are too similar and I think David sticks out because it has a different starting letter. Jonathan and David on their own are lovely names but I would choose something that doesn't start with J or D to replace Josh.