View Message

I love it and I’ve loved it since I was a kid. It’s very uncommon here so I never met anyone called it, or any variation of it. But it’s lovely.

This message was edited 5/15/2022, 12:36 PM

Great as a middle name!

It's sturdy, attractive, and a bit no-nonsense. Similar to how I feel about Ruth and Amanda.

When I was really little (like 3 years old) I apparently once said that I wanted to be named Rachel. I'm neutral towards it now.

I think Rachel is a pretty neat, and good name. I have no problems with it whatsoever. I feel like Raquel would be a good alternative. But for now, Rachel is nice, usable, and simple.

---

Rachel Elizabeth
Rachel Miranda
Rachel Helena
Rachel Seraphina

Love it

I love it. It's such a sweet, very beautiful and nice.

I've only known one in South Africa, and she had immigrated from England. Nice, neat, streamlined name; the one I met was known as Ray, which I didn't like.

Boring, shallow, uncreative, and conjures the image of a spoiled brat.

it's pleasant and unfussy, though I would only ever use it as a mn if at all. I prefer the ... fussier ... Raquel orRachelle.

It’s ok but really boring at this point.

I love it