New Post
Search
HelpRe: Hugh?
in reply to a message by Stacia
Hugh Alexander is awesome, IMO. I'm not a huge fan of Alexander generally but it fits really well there. I love Hugh (and Hugo) and think it has a lot of charm. It's just... cool. Classy. Kind of sophisticated without being stuffy. I think similarly of names like Arthur, Stuart, and Clive.
The abolition of religion as the illusory happiness of the people is the demand for their real happiness.
To call on them to give up their illusions about their condition is to call on them to give up a condition that requires illusions.
-Marx-
To call on them to give up their illusions about their condition is to call on them to give up a condition that requires illusions.
-Marx-
Archived Thread - replies disabled
1
Replies
Thanks! :o) I don't usually like to stick Alexander in a pair, either, unless it's a really short first name that's not very common. I like it as a mn for Rhys also.
Stuart is wonderful!
_________________________________________________
John: Why do you know all this random, useless stuff?
Me: One day I will win a lot of money on Jeopardy.
Stuart is wonderful!
_________________________________________________
John: Why do you know all this random, useless stuff?
Me: One day I will win a lot of money on Jeopardy.
1