New Post
Search
HelpAura
Thoughts?
"People say nothing is impossible, but I do nothing all day."
Rate my personal name list please :) https://www.behindthename.com/pnl/217493
"People say nothing is impossible, but I do nothing all day."
Rate my personal name list please :) https://www.behindthename.com/pnl/217493
Archived Thread - replies disabled
1
Replies
Edit: I changed my posting name in case any mods say “Post by your own name” I am Inxpect.
Aura is a word. So I don’t like it.
Aura is a word. So I don’t like it.
This message was edited 8/20/2021, 6:41 AM
1
I like it a lot. It's pretty and mystical. In English it also sounds lots better than Aurora.
1
Wow, I guess I’m the outlier so far…I really, really dislike it. It sounds like a yawn. It’s so airy and floaty and has absolutely no substance to it. Kind of the same vibe (and reason I loathe) as Echo.
2
Obviously, I absolutely love this name!
This message was edited 8/19/2021, 2:19 PM
2
I love it. It has a very pleasing sound. I really like it as a nn for -ora names, since Aura/Ora sound the same when I say them.
2
As I’ve just said in the post before yours, it’s fine but it’s very new age and I don’t particularly like that.
Unsure why you would post this immediately after someone else posted about the name— it feels like it’s taking up room on a board with limited space.
Unsure why you would post this immediately after someone else posted about the name— it feels like it’s taking up room on a board with limited space.
3
Because I can? I’m asking about the name individually itself. Not as a set. I thought it was interesting and cool so I asked a question. I don’t really see how I’m “taking up” space here.
3
It’s repetitive having the same name posted about twice in a row, especially since it pushes other posts off the page now. People are going to give their opinions on individual names even when the post is about “sets” :)
This message was edited 8/19/2021, 1:17 PM
3
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
This message was edited 8/19/2021, 1:47 PM
3
It’s subjective, clearly :)
2
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
This message was edited 8/19/2021, 2:02 PM
1
I just don’t get why you would post the same name someone else has just posted about when you could simply read the responses the other person gets.
3
I simply asked about the name Aura because I wanted I know peoples opinions on it individually. I can definitely agree that it gets annoying when we see the same post on here we’ve already seen at maximum a month ago, but in my opinion at least I wasn’t doing that.
I think we should just end this conversation here because it’s not getting anybody anywhere.
I think we should just end this conversation here because it’s not getting anybody anywhere.
1
It’s not an argument, lol. Nobody is trying to “get” anywhere.
3
It seems to be it’s about to get there considering this part of the thread as already gotten a bit too far over something generally trivial.
By the way, my post here are sorted by “active now” so I actually didn’t even see my post was right above it.
By the way, my post here are sorted by “active now” so I actually didn’t even see my post was right above it.
1
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
2
Totally!
Also, just saw this edit:
You’re right, that wouldn’t make sense :) People on here have often mentioned that someone posts a lot (not what is happening here, but bear with me), it “pushes down” other posts so it’s a courtesy to not spam and if you have a bunch of questions to put them in one post. It’s the same reason we’re not supposed to create more than 5 topics a day. I think that’s more relevant now given the board layout, the way it’s split into pages. So it just kinda bugged me when I saw Aura immediately above Aura, Circe, and Ursa, because you can just read the responses to the first one, as I mentioned, without having to create a new post. It’s just a minor courtesy, an idea left over from when I used to post regularly. Not a big deal but I genuinely didn’t “get” the point of doing it.
Also, just saw this edit:
You’re right, that wouldn’t make sense :) People on here have often mentioned that someone posts a lot (not what is happening here, but bear with me), it “pushes down” other posts so it’s a courtesy to not spam and if you have a bunch of questions to put them in one post. It’s the same reason we’re not supposed to create more than 5 topics a day. I think that’s more relevant now given the board layout, the way it’s split into pages. So it just kinda bugged me when I saw Aura immediately above Aura, Circe, and Ursa, because you can just read the responses to the first one, as I mentioned, without having to create a new post. It’s just a minor courtesy, an idea left over from when I used to post regularly. Not a big deal but I genuinely didn’t “get” the point of doing it.
4
I was hardly trying to say it’s an argument, but in that case this discussion is pointless is my point here.
1
I don’t think it’s pointless :)
2
Don't like it
1