View Message

Louise vs. Clara
Which do you like, better? Hmm. Your ideas are intriguing to me and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Replies

This isn't relevant to the question, but...
I just randomly came across a record of someone named Luise Clara Charlotte b 1878...then I was curious so found an unrelated Louise Clara Charlotte born in 1858, plus a Clara Charlotte Louise b 1866...and I'm sure there's more. They both seem mid/late 19th century German (and linked to Charlotte).I prefer Louise because it feels like it has more gravitas, and I prefer saying it. The 2nd syllable in Clara sounds like overkill to me, because I'm used to and like Clare already - somehow that makes Clara seem clunky/frilly/frumpy even though it's shortish - also, Cora seems a similar style/age/sound, and I like that more).

This message was edited 10/6/2019, 12:33 AM

vote up1
I prefer Clara. I do think Louise could sound stuffy, but it also reminds me of the Bob's Burgers character so that does not make me think Louise is so stuffy after all, haha.
vote up1
Clara for sure. Clara is harsh and brassy, but it's classic, antique enough to not be dowdy anymore, and feminine in a strong way. I mentally have it in a category with names like Helen, Martha, and Dorothy.Louise seems more mediocre. Like a name that was trendy in its time, rather than feeling like a classic. It goes with names like Shirley, Rita, Thelma in my mind. And sounds ugly to my ears, luWEEZ. Louisa's better, more classicky to me and less ugly - but not better than Clara, because WEE.

This message was edited 10/4/2019, 5:35 PM

vote up1
Clara, but pronounced CLEAR-uh.Louise sounds too snottily regal to me.

This message was edited 10/4/2019, 2:22 PM

vote up1
I've never heard Clara pronounced that way. Where are you from?
vote up1
Neither have I.I've just heard claire-a and clar-a.
vote up1
I second this.Clara is usually read as 'Claire-uh'(Which is my prefered pronounciation) and sometimes as 'Clar-uh' (A difference between an 'air' and 'are' sound)
The pronounciation of 'Clear-uh' is strange to say the least.

This message was edited 10/4/2019, 8:05 PM

vote up1
Clara, 100%.
Louise sounds kinda old-ladyish.
.
.
.
.
.
.
vote up1
I quite like them both, but I like Eloise better than Louise and Clare better than Clara, so I'd never use either.Confusingly, I think I like Louise better than Clara but Clare better than Eloise.
vote up1
same.Clare, Eloise, Louise, then Clara.

This message was edited 10/4/2019, 10:26 PM

vote up1
Clara, by a large margin. It's a very beautiful and sophisticated name. I've always admired it, even well before my youngest niece came along.
I've never cared for Louise. It just sounds stuffy and dated to me.
vote up1
Clara as Clah-ruh. Louise is too wheezy for me.
vote up1
Clara sounds prettier to me. I really like that whole family of names (Clara, Claire, Clarice, etc). That's just my preference. Louise doesn't have quite the same sparkle to it for me.

This message was edited 10/4/2019, 11:42 AM

vote up1
In reality, Clara (or Klara). Louise is dated here and not something I'd personally use but I do like the sound. Clara/Klara has been a favorite for years but I'm getting a bit tired of it.
vote up1
vote up1
vote up1
vote up1
Both are lovely, but Clara wins out for me. The “wheeze” part of Louise sticks out a bit.
vote up1