View Message

New Post
Search
Help
Interesting Sibset
by Thalia (jmacsgurl1991)
8/8/2019, 3:39 PM
I learned of a local set of siblings with interesting names. They range in age from 12 to 5. The youngest three are triplets.Rayden (b)
Coyer (b)
Hazyl (g) Levicy (g?) and Bronly (b?)I am not 100% certain which is which for the triplets but I assume this is correct.What does everyone think?
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Replies

- Crista (firefly123)
8/9/2019, 5:47 AM
"Interesting" is not the word I would use. I'd love to know how the parents came up with those names!
vote up1
- Pink Princess
8/9/2019, 3:40 AM
Not interesting names, horrible names! What is with people and just shoving letters together and "creating" names?! Those poor kids, they will have to correct people on how to pronounce their names and spell them, for the rest of their lives.
vote up1
- Canielle
8/9/2019, 3:15 AM
I don’t like any of them though I wouldn’t mind Hazel if spelt correctly. Bronly reminds me of something my 2 year old niece might use. My niece named the bear my husband and I gave her for being our flower girl Bridie.
vote up1
- Felie
8/9/2019, 12:46 AM
Hi !!!Rayden, Coyer, Hazyl, Levicy and Bronly?They are horrible names! I dislike them all. None of them has a history nor a correct spelling. They seem all madeup. Not my style at all.

This message was edited 8/9/2019, 12:47 AM

vote up1
- A (guest)
8/8/2019, 4:08 PM
That is horrible.
vote up1
- ari.
8/8/2019, 3:44 PM
The only one that's even mildly acceptable is Hazel - or rather, it would be, were it spelt properly. Rayden is just as ugly as Brayden and Kayden, Coyer is an even worse take on Coy, Levicy sounds like a feminine spin of Leviticus, and Bronly sounds like something an infant would name its doll.
vote up1