View Message

I love Ruby, Violet and Amelia. Zoe is nice, but common and started to feel dated to the early 2000s.

I like Violet best, but Ruby and Zoe are also nice.

Hi !!!

---

Zoe 9/10 it has always been in my list of names to use in real la despite a different pronounciation. Simple, evocative, ancient.

---

Violet 6/10 tied to a character. If there were not it I would dislike Violet because of the sound.

---

Ruby 7/10 nice enough but ambiguous here (the sound is the same of 'rubi' "you steal"). I prefer Rubina.

---

Amelia 5/10 boring.

Out of those four, I'd maybe consider Zoe, though I'd probably rather choose Chloe.

---

I dislike the other three just about equally. Vi is unpleasant, Ruby is too attention-seeking and Amelia is a very poor substitute for Emily.

Gorgeous names! I think they’re all beautiful. I forgot how pretty of a name Ruby is!

This message was edited 1/7/2019, 10:50 PM

Violet and Amelia are pretty and timeless. Zoe sounds very youthful to me and is the name of a friend's cat.

---

I am not fond of Ruby. Along with names like Diamond, Topaz, Emerald, Jewel, Armani, Mercedes, Chanel, etc..., it seems like it is trying so hard to sound expensive that it comes across as cheap.