View Message

This is a reply within a larger thread: view the whole thread

Re: Rachel
It's a classic. It fits in a "professional" environment. It's also still visible on kids. Nothing really "objectionable" about it... I just don't like it. I don't understand how the "aitch" sound could be perceived as attractive - and I don't even think Rachel, the original (English) spelling, looks complete. I actually think Rachael looks better, though the sound still isn't attractive, imo.The Latin Rahel, however, is pretty.***Please rate my personal name lists:www.behindthename.com/pnl/69381
www.behindthename.com/pnl/69381/109399
www.behindthename.com/pnl/69381/91835
http://greens-end.myminicity.com/

This message was edited 5/3/2018, 3:24 PM

Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Replies

Agree with all of this. Its sound is very grating to the ear. Not pleasant at all. Rahel is much prettier.

This message was edited 5/4/2018, 7:28 AM

vote up1