View Message

This is a reply within a larger thread: view the whole thread

YES!
in reply to a message by Mar
This is exactly my reasoning!Even names that are originally male are now written out because for fear they might sound girly.. as if that is such a terrible thing.Women can be strong and powerful, but men must never seem feminine or soft.
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Replies

But that just means that boys' names need more freedom, not that girls' names need less!
I say girls should take advantage of the freedom they have to use any kind of name, and boys should also use any kind of name because they should have the same amount of freedom.
vote up1
This is fine, but we don't live in a world yet where it's the case that girl names are used on boys nearly as frequently as boy names are used on girls. Until that happens when a boy name is used on girls it reinforces the perception that masculinity is the ideal and femininity is devalued.

This message was edited 3/8/2018, 8:35 AM

vote up1
Yep, exactly my point.It's so completely different standards. You can't even use a name that is originally male without copping so much crap.
I knew a boy named Madison and he gets horrible comments from everyone, even random strangers who will even ask if he is gay or transgendered..
But a girl named Kyle, Beau, Finlay or James, gets compliments on her 'strong' name. As if femininity is a bad thing.. or to be remotely 'girly' is bad.
vote up1
Agreed completelyAgreed completely.
vote up1