Message: "Re: Not necessarily (m)"

Re: Not necessarily (m)

by Theodora'sMommy (Nemesis0408)

1/8/2018, 12:30 PM

Well exactly. You don’t know if they’re the type to find it hurtful or shameful or not. So why not play it safe and give them their own special name, just for them? There’s a whole world of wonderful names out there.

Messages

Ruby · Morgan1599 · 1/7/2018, 5:55 AM

•Re: Ruby · Pink Princess · 1/11/2018, 2:52 AM

•Re: Ruby · Jagoda · 1/8/2018, 9:34 AM

•Re: Ruby · Laslow · 1/8/2018, 5:27 AM

•Re: Ruby · chaotic · 1/7/2018, 6:25 PM

•Re: Ruby · number1212 · 1/7/2018, 4:43 PM

•Re: Ruby · peonini · 1/7/2018, 8:45 AM

•Re: Ruby · Morgan1599 · 1/7/2018, 8:57 AM

•Re: Ruby · queenv · 1/7/2018, 9:47 AM

•Re: Ruby · Theodora'sMommy · 1/8/2018, 7:07 AM

•Not necessarily (m) · Jagoda · 1/8/2018, 9:33 AM

•Re: Not necessarily (m) · Theodora'sMommy · 1/8/2018, 12:30 PM

•Re: Not necessarily (m) · Jagoda · 1/8/2018, 2:45 PM

•Re: Not necessarily (m) · Sofia · 1/8/2018, 9:59 AM

•Re: Ruby · Felie · 1/7/2018, 8:43 AM

•Re: Ruby · Theodora'sMommy · 1/7/2018, 8:34 AM

•Re: Ruby · Morgan1599 · 1/7/2018, 8:43 AM

•Re: Ruby · RoxStar · 1/7/2018, 8:02 AM

•Re: Ruby · queenv · 1/7/2018, 6:41 AM

View Message

Messages