Re: Ruby
Sometimes people use names for their pets that they love enough to use for a child, but they are not planning on having any more or any children. That's why I once had a dog named Miranda and my sister once had a dog named Sean.However, if some accident had occurred to either of us, or if our plans had changed, I may have named a daughter Miranda and my sister may have named a son Sean. In this case, it would be because we wouldn't have wanted to eliminate a name we loved because we at one time thought we wouldn't have more children. It wouldn't have been naming the child after the pet.
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Messages

Ruby  ·  Morgan1599  ·  1/7/2018, 5:55 AM
Re: Ruby  ·  Pink Princess  ·  1/11/2018, 2:52 AM
Re: Ruby  ·  Jagoda  ·  1/8/2018, 9:34 AM
Re: Ruby  ·  Laslow  ·  1/8/2018, 5:27 AM
Re: Ruby  ·  chaotic  ·  1/7/2018, 6:25 PM
Re: Ruby  ·  number1212  ·  1/7/2018, 4:43 PM
Re: Ruby  ·  peonini  ·  1/7/2018, 8:45 AM
Re: Ruby  ·  Morgan1599  ·  1/7/2018, 8:57 AM
Re: Ruby  ·  queenv  ·  1/7/2018, 9:47 AM
Re: Ruby  ·  Theodora'sMommy  ·  1/8/2018, 7:07 AM
Not necessarily (m)  ·  Jagoda  ·  1/8/2018, 9:33 AM
Re: Not necessarily (m)  ·  Theodora'sMommy  ·  1/8/2018, 12:30 PM
Re: Not necessarily (m)  ·  Jagoda  ·  1/8/2018, 2:45 PM
Re: Not necessarily (m)  ·  Sofia  ·  1/8/2018, 9:59 AM
Re: Ruby  ·  Felie  ·  1/7/2018, 8:43 AM
Re: Ruby  ·  Theodora'sMommy  ·  1/7/2018, 8:34 AM
Re: Ruby  ·  Morgan1599  ·  1/7/2018, 8:43 AM
Re: Ruby  ·  RoxStar  ·  1/7/2018, 8:02 AM
Re: Ruby  ·  queenv  ·  1/7/2018, 6:41 AM