View Message

This is a reply within a larger thread: view the whole thread

Re: Dolores Umbridge from Harry Potter completely removed that name from my list...nt
in reply to a message by Bear
I'm guessing that you haven't read the Harry Potter books, then. Dolores Umbridge isn't a 'minor character'; she's a major evil character in one of the books who spends most of that book physically torturing Harry as punishment. I found that book very hard to read - it was sickening - and I very much doubt that anyone who reads those books as a child or teenager will ever be able to disassociate the name Dolores from the cruelty in that book.

ChrisellAll we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us. - J.R.R. Tolkien.

Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Replies

Agreed.
vote up1
No, I haven't read the books. I gathered that the character was not a good one. :-( Witches / bad characters have some of the best names, to me. (Ex: Ursula, Drusilla, Damien.) But I take your point. I just really hate that one fictional character could cause so much harm to an innocent name. Are we really so weak and impressionable?
vote up1
I agreeSadly, whether the person is real or fiction, people are influenced by who bears a particular name.
Dolores Umbridge was a totally frightful over the top baddy who was far from being a minor character, she tortured the hero both physically and mentally. also she was described as looking like a fat toad.
Fans of the book probably concider her character to be just as famous as Guinevere or Juliet only with none of their redemming features. They will find it difficult to put that association aside.Personally I rather like the name Dolores / Delores, but then I have different associations with it to counter the Umbridge one


Paula

This message was edited 3/20/2006, 3:29 PM

vote up1