It's something I consider. It's not because of name frequency, as
Rachel Shaina said that is not a huge factor anymore. It's because I think high popularity tells me that a name will have a certain image. Or at least, a certain aspect to it, that less relatively-popular names don't have. And it's almost like, the less that popularity means great frequency, the more that seems true.
But, it is usually not something that would stop me from using a name - especially one that wasn't a trendy-style name like
Mason,
Liam,
Mia,
Ava. I would have used
Alexander for my son if my husband hadn't agreed on something else, and I think of that as a really popular name (it's even one that is perceived as overused in some demographics).
I feel like
Noah is more overused than that even. But, for guynames a little blandness can be appealing, in a way that I don't feel it is for girlnames. So I don't know if I would use
Noah or not. It's really hard to say because it's not my style. I start to think I probably wouldn't, but then, I don't love it, so I don't know.
I think I would have used
Charlotte or
Sophie if we hadn't been able to agree on other names, and
Sophie definitely has Noah-level popularity-effect. But I do like it enough that I would have used it if compromising made it necessary, so ... yeah. There you are.
- mirfakThis message was edited 12/6/2015, 11:00 AM