New Post
Search
HelpRe: Julia
in reply to a message by Billina
It's beautiful, like woah very - and since it's so classic it's also sort of boring and so its beauty is less noticeable.
Boringness to me is how non-faddish a name seems, how typical, how international.
It's not one of the very most boring classic names, lika Anna, Elizabeth, the John-based names, Margaret, Mary, Katherine.
It's medium-boring, like Rose, Laura, Caroline / Charlotte, Sophia, Victoria, Susanna, Patricia, Alexandra, Diana, Madeline, Martha, Sarah, Eve.
It's more boring than some classic names like - Augusta, Bridget, Sylvia, Virginia, Flavia, Agatha, Barbara, Cynthia, Eugenia, Camilla, Wilhelmina, Priscilla, Dorothy, Ruth, Irene. But IMO it's also more beautiful than those.
- mirfak
Boringness to me is how non-faddish a name seems, how typical, how international.
It's not one of the very most boring classic names, lika Anna, Elizabeth, the John-based names, Margaret, Mary, Katherine.
It's medium-boring, like Rose, Laura, Caroline / Charlotte, Sophia, Victoria, Susanna, Patricia, Alexandra, Diana, Madeline, Martha, Sarah, Eve.
It's more boring than some classic names like - Augusta, Bridget, Sylvia, Virginia, Flavia, Agatha, Barbara, Cynthia, Eugenia, Camilla, Wilhelmina, Priscilla, Dorothy, Ruth, Irene. But IMO it's also more beautiful than those.
- mirfak
This message was edited 5/21/2015, 11:42 AM
Archived Thread - replies disabled
1