I don't really consider name-nerdiness to be a hobby. I might have, years ago, but being around people who really are name-nerdes has kind of soured me on it. To me, extreme name-nerdiness is the epitome of showing off and being pretentious. Like the annoying kid in class who is always going "actually..." and nitpicking apart the lesson till it's barely recognizable and has totally bored and confused the other students.
And
Daisy as a nn for
Margaret seems especially pretentious and show-off because it is not natural.
Meg or
Maggie would be a natural nn for
Margaret, but
Daisy is only a nn because of some little trick of language.
Marguerite is an old-fashioned word for
Daisy, and somebody way back when decided that
Marguerite was the same as
Margaret, even though
Margaret means pearl. So to insist on using
Daisy as a nn for
Margaret seems very much like putting on airs and trying too hard to show off how classically-literate and name-nerdy you are.
This message was edited 3/16/2013, 3:24 PM