New Post
Search
HelpReplies
I would not say it is usable.
I don't mind Lola, though. It's an old family name for me, given before the modern connotation formed.
I don't mind Lola, though. It's an old family name for me, given before the modern connotation formed.
1
There's Lolita Davidovich, Canadian movie and tv actress.Perhaps not well known, but I see from Wikipedia that she's been in steady work for years.
1
Nope. Nabokov aside, lolitas also = Japanese girls in deeply hideous wedding-cake dresses, like this:
1
Count me as a Lolita fashion hater. It's "artistic" but so is lots of gross shit out there. Interesting ≠ good. I find it.... "tacky" is the laziest term that is still appropriate. Just hugely hugely tacky.
1
aw, I'm surprised.
1
*nods*
Oh yeah it's good hideous. I love the way it takes the piss out of conventional notions of femininity. And I'd 1000000x rather see one of these than some identikit pole-dancing beach-bodied booty-caller type.
Still hideous though.:D
Oh yeah it's good hideous. I love the way it takes the piss out of conventional notions of femininity. And I'd 1000000x rather see one of these than some identikit pole-dancing beach-bodied booty-caller type.
Still hideous though.:D
1
I can see your point. It's pink overload, and that's coming from someone who LOVES pink.
1
I don't think the point of Lolita fashion is to look good . I think it's more to turn heads and be artistic.
1
I love the Lolita fashion things! They're like walking art.
1
Sorry, but no.
That's a name with way, way too many negative connotations to use. While probably not on the exact same level as Lucifer, it's still... yeah, no.
Lola is fine, though. I mean with that, you just have the song to worry about. :-)
That's a name with way, way too many negative connotations to use. While probably not on the exact same level as Lucifer, it's still... yeah, no.
Lola is fine, though. I mean with that, you just have the song to worry about. :-)
1
no...
It is not. Even people that haven't read the book or seen the movie know the meaning of the word, more often than not.
It is not. Even people that haven't read the book or seen the movie know the meaning of the word, more often than not.
1
Lolita has become synonymous with a certain kind of woman because of the novel. It may not be heard all of the time, but once in a while you hear of someone being called a 'Lolita', like the 'Long Island Lolita', Amy Fisher, who had an affair with a married man when she was 17 and then tried to kill his wife.
1
Ditto, 100%
Not so much the 'meaning', but the association. It's kinda fetishistic.
Let's be honest, even minus the association, I wouldn't like the name. It's silly, childish, dollish and immature. Twee. Girlish to the point of wantonly weird. I don't like Lola and I hate Lolita.
Not because I'm one of those prudes who go 'LOLITA! EW! NABUKOV WAS A PAEDO!', but because the name isn't all that pretty and the public pop-culture link has very much made it no-go.
Not so much the 'meaning', but the association. It's kinda fetishistic.
Let's be honest, even minus the association, I wouldn't like the name. It's silly, childish, dollish and immature. Twee. Girlish to the point of wantonly weird. I don't like Lola and I hate Lolita.
Not because I'm one of those prudes who go 'LOLITA! EW! NABUKOV WAS A PAEDO!', but because the name isn't all that pretty and the public pop-culture link has very much made it no-go.
1