View Message

This is a reply within a larger thread: view the whole thread

Re: Julia?
I think it's a little boring and it reminds me of the late 80s and early 90s. It is a classic but classics can sound dated too (e.g. Amanda, Stephanie, Jessica). I wouldn't say it is timeless. Elizabeth always sounds classic whereas Amanda, while being a classic, sounds dated and I think Julia is more like Amanda than Elizabeth. It still sounds fresh now but I think it may remind people of the 90s in a few years.If you like it, use it. It's too common for my taste but it's a nice name. I much prefer Julie (dated but will make a comeback, I think) and Juliet.
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Replies

I've never thought of Amanda, Stephanie, or Jessica as classic names. Not at all. Hmm...
vote up1
Hmmm to me they are classics :P I mean Amanda was used in 1880 and before. Stephanie and Jessica are really old too. It was used by Shakespeare. Ok, not as old as some other names, I guess :P

This message was edited 4/22/2012, 3:06 PM

vote up1