View Message

Presley
WDYT??? Better for a boy or girl???"Never make someone a priority, who only makes you an option."
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Replies

Should be reserved as a surname, and preferably for those related to Elvis. :b It's too connected to him, and not cute for either gender imo. ~Heather~
vote up1
Boy. And actually I rather like it. Obviously it's strongly associated to Elvis Presley, but I don't think it's necessarily a bad thing. More like a neutral thing in my opinion.Anyway I think it's more refreshing right now among the the trendier surnames that are in style like Landon, Carter, Cooper, etc...
vote up1
Better for a girl, but too trendy and too "Elvis" ...
_____________________________________________________________________Elinor'Why do people with closed minds, always open their mouths?'
vote up1
I think Prseley could be ok as a MN for a boy or girl. I want to say that as a FN it is better for a boy, but then I thought maybe not. It is after all a surname, and a girl wouldn't be as labled having it, while maybe a boy would feel forced to live up to an Elvis image, or get too many Elvis comments?
vote up1
I actually quite like it for some reason (though I'd never use it) and prefer it on a girl. I don't mind it for a boy though and especially like how Cindy Crawford used it, Presley Walker.
Jacks"The newborn baby has only three demands. They are warmth in the arms of its mother, food from her breasts, and security in the knowledge of her presence. Breastfeeding satisfies all three". Dr.Grantly Dick-Read
vote up1
I don't care for it, but it seems better suited for a boy.
vote up1
Better for a boy, but I don't like it.
vote up1
It's better for a boy but to tell the truth I wouldn't use it for a child unless I absolutely loved it. Presley immediately makes me think of Elvis Presley, so naming a child Presley (or Elvis) just makes me think that the parents really wanted to honor the king of rock & roll! :)Image hosted by Photobucket.com
Have yourself a buggy little Christmas! I've adopted 26 ! and 4 @, see my profile
vote up1
I was actually thinking about this name about a month ago, and thought it would be cute on a little boy. However I then realised a while later (it didn't click straight away) that it's probably not usable because of Elvis. I don't think it would be good on a girl at all, unless it was a family name and used as a mn.
vote up1
Mum to Hayley Anne. :)Nice for a boy. :)
vote up1
I hate the name for a girl, but for a boy I really like it. It makes me think of Elvis Presley of course, so that's probably why I prefer it for a boy. Being a big Elvis fan like I am, I could use it!
vote up1
I'm going to say neither, however I've heard it used more on a girl. _____

This message was edited 12/14/2005, 5:00 PM

vote up1
I really don't like the name for either a boy or a girl. It's just nmsaa. But it is better on a boy.
vote up1
neither really but if you insist a boy :)Image hosted by Photobucket.com


Paula

vote up1
I think it's better for a boy
vote up1