View Message

This is a reply within a larger thread: view the whole thread

Re:
in reply to a message by BBH
I wasn't implying you didn't, just that the association's too obvious. I really can't imagine this as a person's name.
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Replies

Re:I don't think it is bad, with the abundance of Genevas, Londons, Parises, Florences, Montanas, Dakotas, and maybe even the occasional Vienna.I think I'd rather hear a Zurich than any of those, though I do like Geneva.
vote up1
Re:Right but you don't like those and yet you're categorising Zurich with them. I mean if you like it you like it, but you have to be aware that other people are going to put them in the same group as Geneva and London and Paris and Florence and Montana and Dakota and Vienna.
vote up1
agreeI'd rather see a Zurich than a Brooklyn, Montana or Dakota. It's more interesting.
vote up1