View Message

This is a reply within a larger thread: view the whole thread

Does ANYONE besides me hate Maud(e)?!
I cannot STAND the names Maud or Maude. They're frumpy, clunky, and I always think "Maud the Fraud." Am I the only one here who thinks this?!Iris, on the other hand, is lovely and classy. Two thumbs up.
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up2

Replies

Thank you!Sometimes I feel like the only person on here who doesn't love just any old ancient name. Some are ugly. This is one of them.
vote up2
Yes!I think Maud(e) is horrible. It's ugly, clunky, downtrodden and...ew. Iris, however, is really lovely.
vote up2
Maud sound like the German word for "murder" so I dislike it
vote up2
I agree.I feel likewise about Anneliese and Beatrice, as a matter of interest. To me they--along with Maude--sound like a derelict living room set with moldering upholstery and yellowed doilies. No kidding.
vote up2
I dislike Maude also but Iris is no better. I hate the eye sound
vote up2
I avoid thatby using the Hebrew pronunciation ee-REES. I think it's even lovelier than EYE-riss, although I do like that as well.
vote up2
Couldn't agree more!Maud and Maude just sound frumpy, old-fashioned and clunkyto me and Iris is absolutely lovely, fresh and interesting.
vote up2
I dislike both of them,but I don't take issue with Maud(e) quite the way I do with, say, Abigail.
vote up2
ditto, I know heaps of women named Iris in their 40s, too early for a comeback
vote up2
A bit too early, yes.I guess it's coming back a bit now because Lily and other flower names are big... but haven't flower names always been big? Another couple decades and I'll be ready for Iris.
vote up2
Me tooMaude is hideous.
vote up2
Me, me!I agree with what you said. And there's nothing pleasant-sounding about it whatsoever. I like Iris, though.
vote up2