Message: "No." - Behind the Name

No.

by bananarama

10/24/2008, 1:05 PM

It shouldn't. Jack has no substance or life to it. It's grossly overused and cliche, not timeless like John, the name where it came from. Am I the only person in the world who hates the name Jack?

Messages

Jack · MelvinSpelvin · 10/24/2008, 12:24 PM

•Re: Jack · Laine · 10/26/2008, 2:21 PM

•On its own works best · Mar · 10/25/2008, 1:45 PM

•Re: Jack · lac · 10/24/2008, 10:20 PM

•I think it works (m) · Joan-Ay · 10/24/2008, 6:43 PM

•Re: Jack · Jaimeson Jade · 10/24/2008, 5:47 PM

•Re: Jack · Skye Morgan · 10/24/2008, 5:02 PM

•Re: Jack · Amazing · 10/24/2008, 4:08 PM

•Re: Jack · Dot · 10/24/2008, 2:53 PM

•Re: Jack · Tiziri · 10/24/2008, 2:47 PM

•Re: Jack · Andromache · 10/24/2008, 2:38 PM

•Re: Jack · Sekhmet · 10/24/2008, 1:59 PM

•Re: Jack · Cassandra Grace Logan · 10/24/2008, 1:55 PM

•Re: Jack · Kristen · 10/24/2008, 1:52 PM

•Re: Jack · Lily8 · 10/24/2008, 1:40 PM

•No. · bananarama · 10/24/2008, 1:05 PM

•No, you're not. · MelvinSpelvin · 10/24/2008, 1:28 PM

•Re: Jack · Megan · 10/24/2008, 12:33 PM

•Re: Jack · Jen (from work) · 10/24/2008, 12:33 PM

•I think it could why not? nt · Sabrina Fair · 10/24/2008, 12:29 PM

•Re: Jack · HeidiB317 · 10/24/2008, 12:25 PM

View Message

Messages