View Message
New Post
Search
HelpRe: Names that would harm a child are inappropriate (m - language warning)
by Hufflepuffer (Ora)
8/16/2008, 7:26 PM
in reply to a message by LMS
I'm not going to justify my opinions to you when you're obviously looking for an argument.
I, personally, do not think Cohen, Gypsy, or Cherokee are inappropriate or offensive. Ignorant - yes - but not offensive.
I stick by what I said.
I, personally, do not think Cohen, Gypsy, or Cherokee are inappropriate or offensive. Ignorant - yes - but not offensive.
I stick by what I said.
Archived Thread - replies disabled
1
Messages
•Oh, pardon me .... I hope my point came across regardless of the technicality. nt · mirfak · 8/18/2008, 12:04 AM
•@_@ What's with you and making really pointless argumentative posts? · Rachel Shay · 8/16/2008, 8:25 PM
•Names that would harm a child are inappropriate (m - language warning) · Hufflepuffer · 8/16/2008, 3:05 PM
•Re: Names that would harm a child are inappropriate (m - language warning) · LMS · 8/16/2008, 6:07 PM
•Re: Names that would harm a child are inappropriate (m - language warning) · Hufflepuffer · 8/16/2008, 7:26 PM
•Re: Names that would harm a child are inappropriate (m - language warning) · LMS · 8/16/2008, 7:30 PM
•I agree. IMO "American" names don't exist unless referring to Native Americans. nt · Aileen · 8/16/2008, 9:08 PM