Really?
in reply to a message by Laree
Tanith seems to fit in very, very well with all the current names. I see on a child much more easily than a lot of the names I hear on the board. Hmm, I'll have to think of that.
Replies
Well, you'll notice...
... that none of my feminine names tend to carry much weight. Even my more "boy-ish" favorites (Quinn, Sloane, Hollis) are rather light. So I guess I have a hard time with "bulky-er" names, which is what I concider Tanith to be.
Also, now I think about it, I really don't even like weighty names on boy's (my favorites being River, Shannon, August, ect.). I guess I'm just a feather-weight namer :-)
... that none of my feminine names tend to carry much weight. Even my more "boy-ish" favorites (Quinn, Sloane, Hollis) are rather light. So I guess I have a hard time with "bulky-er" names, which is what I concider Tanith to be.
Also, now I think about it, I really don't even like weighty names on boy's (my favorites being River, Shannon, August, ect.). I guess I'm just a feather-weight namer :-)