View Message

I don't understand why people say it's dated. True, its popularity peaked during the 1950s, but it is a classic name from a Biblical root and surely should be considered timeless. Perhaps you could consider Susanna or Susannah, both popular in the eighteeenth century with the nns Sukie/Sukey rather than Susie. Those nns could work for Susan too - I think Sue is the boring bit, not Susan!

This message was edited 4/15/2008, 8:32 AM