New Post
Search
HelpDude, it's NOT Harry Potter AT ALL.
in reply to a message by Emma Cummings
And for that matter, neither is Lily, James, Harry, Fred, George, Oliver, Dolores, Ariana, Peter, Molly, Charlie, Bill, Percy, Seamus, Lavender, Dean, Teddy, Tom, Bertha, Rose, Hugo, Gabrielle, Viktor, Horace, Aurora, Charity, Neville, Wilhelmina, Fabian, Gideon, Frank, Amelia, Rufus, Stan, Cornelius, Amos, Cedric, Alice, Frank, or any of the purposefully REALLY traditional or even slightly out-there (but still traditional) names JK often picked for her characters.
Arthur is great. Handsome and dignified. I'm not too keen on Art but I don't mind it.
Arthur is great. Handsome and dignified. I'm not too keen on Art but I don't mind it.
Archived Thread - replies disabled
1
Replies
Damn straight.
Arthur is, if anything, a legendary king to me first and foremost, NOT the father of Harry Potter's sidekick. People will say to me, "Oh, you like a lot of HP names." I like Arthur, George, Percy, Alice, Poppy, Minerva...there are so many names in that book, how is one supposed to avoid them?
Anyway, on the topic of Arthur, I think it's a smashing name. Art is fine too, though I probably wouldn't use it.
Arthur is, if anything, a legendary king to me first and foremost, NOT the father of Harry Potter's sidekick. People will say to me, "Oh, you like a lot of HP names." I like Arthur, George, Percy, Alice, Poppy, Minerva...there are so many names in that book, how is one supposed to avoid them?
Anyway, on the topic of Arthur, I think it's a smashing name. Art is fine too, though I probably wouldn't use it.
1
LOL, I totally agree!
1