Message: "Re: Why did some names more/less "classic" than the other, even though the peaks were around the same time?"

[Opinions] Re: Why did some names more/less "classic" than the other, even though the peaks were around the same time?

by Francisinfp5w4

2/27/2024, 4:25 AM

Examples include Amy, Angela, and Christina, all of which were names in the top 100 in the 1970s and 1979s and also peaked at this time. (Sorry for the late reply)

This message was edited 2/27/2024, 4:26 AM

Messages

Why did some names more/less "classic" than the other, even though the peaks were around the same time? · Francisinfp5w4 · 2/27/2024, 3:17 AM

•Re: Why did some names more/less "classic" than the other, even though the peaks were around the same time? · New_Chloë · 2/27/2024, 5:23 AM

•Re: Why did some names more/less "classic" than the other, even though the peaks were around the same time? · Francisinfp5w4 · 2/27/2024, 5:31 AM

•Re: Why did some names more/less "classic" than the other, even though the peaks were around the same time? · Amphelise · 2/27/2024, 3:57 AM

•Re: Why did some names more/less "classic" than the other, even though the peaks were around the same time? · Francisinfp5w4 · 2/27/2024, 4:25 AM

•Re: Why did some names more/less "classic" than the other, even though the peaks were around the same time? · Dianatiger · 2/27/2024, 8:37 AM

•Re: Why did some names more/less "classic" than the other, even though the peaks were around the same time? · Dianatiger · 2/27/2024, 8:34 AM

View Message

Messages