View Message

This is a reply within a larger thread: view the whole thread

[Opinions] Re: Thomas, Peter and Rórdán
I do find two accents in the same name a bit excessive. What about Ruairi or Ruairidh? Where I live, Rory is strictly male, but that doesn't help for the planet in general.I don't know many under-10s. Both my grandfathers were Thomas, known as Tom; given enough sons, I'd have used it. Age really isn't an issue for me.I named my son Peter, after a friend. He has two mns, both also honouring. My daughters have five honouring names between them. They all love the family-or-friend connection and don't feel remotely burdened.
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Replies

Thanks!We thought about Ruairi, my husband actually prefers it, but in the US we fear it will not be "easy" for people to say/understand. So, we defaulted to Rory for ease. I agree the double accent looks like a lot, does dropping them make Rordan less than desirable? I think not, I just hate made up names and don't want it to look/feel like I made it up.How old is your son?
vote up1
Would Riordan be a problem in the States? Reer-d'n? And, if people ask about the pronunciation of Ruairi and are told that 'it's like Rory", surely that problem would go away? I don't like dumbing down, especially if there isn't a clear, definite reason for it, not just a fear or suspicion.My son is grown up!
vote up1
I think Riordan is a common enough last name that it should be recognizable. I don't love the "rear" as much as "roar" though. But it is an option.And you're right it is easy to correct. And in a world where people make up crazy spellings for no reason it is silly of me to bat an eye over a legitimate spelling.
vote up1