Message: "Warning: sedative possibly needed to read this :-p"

This is a reply within a larger thread: view the whole thread

[Opinions] Warning: sedative possibly needed to read this :-p

by Miranda (Randee15)

4/2/2006, 4:12 AM

Take a look at the US Social Security's list of popular twin names for 2004: http://www.ssa.gov/OACT/babynames/twins2004.html. Curiously, it doesn't seem to have b/g twin sets, unless you speculate on the so-called "unisex" names listed.

My personal favourites are Mia and Mya and Jacob and James.

Miranda
Image hosting by Photobucket

Proud adopter of 15 punctuation marks; see my profile for their names.

Replies

- Lillian (LillianAMS)

4/2/2006, 6:08 AM

I feel all dizzy and nauseous...*passes out*

~Lillian~
Proud daughter of Ann and John
Proud sister of Lauren and Leah
Proud wife of David
Proud mother of Alexander, Scarlett, Sophia, and Gideon

- Chrisell +2

4/2/2006, 4:35 AM

Yes it does - there's more of them down low on the list than up high, though. There's Natalie & Nathan at 20, Jada & Jaden at 57, Emily & Matthew at 85, Emma & Jacob at 86, Zachary & Zoe at 95 and Emily & Ethan at 99.

I guess that parents of b/g twins are less likely to hit on the *same* tacky combination as other parents!

♦ Chrisell ♦

All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us. - J.R.R. Tolkien.

- Miranda (Randee15) +1

4/2/2006, 5:01 AM

D'oh!

My twofold excuse: 1. it's 5:00 a.m. here, and I really should be asleep, and 2. the similarities temporarily blinded me!

*Jots Jada and Jaden on the personal favourites list*

Miranda
Image hosting by Photobucket

Proud adopter of 15 punctuation marks; see my profile for their names.

- Isla

4/2/2006, 9:39 AM

I know we're extra sensitive about "twinny" names (even you can even lump them all in that category) but you have to wonder WHAT people are thinking. We recently had b/g twins at work named Kayden and Kayla. And I thought that was bad enough. :-/

~Heather~

View Message

Replies