View Message

[Opinions] Kay
Kay has really grown on me. Is it too short or insubstantial as a full name? I'm just worried because lots of people I know just say 'kay instead of okay so I wonder whether it's still usable on its own.I always had a soft spot for Kayley and Kayley nn Kay could work as well. But I don't think I want to use Kayley because it's so trendy. I'd prefer just Kay at the moment. Do you think Kay is trendy sounding because it's in so many trendy names (Kayley, Kayla etc)?
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Replies

Kay is slightly insubstantial as a full name. I would also worry about its similarity to "okay".It's not really trendy sounding because it has a longer history than names like Kayley. I've read old books with characters named Katherine "Kay" and I like that.
vote up1
I like Kay better as a nn than a full name. It works with any name that starts with K. My cousin Karen was occasionally called Kay- she didn't really like it though. Kayley isn't that common where I am, but I do know a couple who go by their full name.
vote up1
I adore Kay. Its the name of my favorite character in a book series I've been reading since I was 12ish.I had the same reservations as you on the name. I think it could totally work as a fisrt name though. Or as a nickname to Katherine or Kathleen. Kayla and the like are so trendy.
vote up1
I don't think Kay is at all trendy. It was trendy back in the thirties/forties, but it's definitely not now. Kay to me is very insubstantial, like a fragment of a name. It's blah, dull, and not very attractive. Very fillerish for a middle name and doubly so for a first name.
vote up1
Kay used to be my favourite name as a kid, and I still have a soft spot for it now. My mother used to say that Kay sounded old fashioned and personally I don't think it's trendy despite the trendy names you've listed.
I fear that Kay is too insubstantial alone and the shortness of Okay to 'Kay makes it difficult to use as a full name. But names grow on other people too and I'm sure a baby Kay would have no difficulty with her name. At least no one would mispronounce it or mispell it (hopefully) :)
vote up1
The only time I've heard it used outside of as a surname (Kay or Kaye) is as a nickname. I knew a sweet older lady named Kathleen and she went by "Kay" and it was perfect for her. Also my friend Sarah calls her sister Katie (just Katie, no full name) "Kay" quite a bit of the time and it fits on her. I like Kay on a girl, and it would actually age quite well, but prefer it as a nickname for Katherine or Kathleen. It would work as a nickname for Kayley but that's so trendy right now.
Kay would be acceptable as a full name for a boy (as in the Authurian legends) but not really as a full name for a girl.
vote up1
Most people would say it's acceptable for a girl. I know three adult females named Kay- two from work, and my mom's cousin. I've also seen where Sir Kay's name is pronounced like Kai, not Kay.
vote up1
I think it's solid and traditional enough to stand on its own. It's a friend of mine's mn and works just fine. If it strikes your fancy, go for it.
vote up1
I think it is substantial enough. When people say 'kay it tends to be a pretty abrupt sound, at least for me Kay has a softer sound. I don't think that Kay itself is trendy at all, because so few people do use it on it's own and it's rare that someone named Kayley or Kayla would actually go by it except amongst close friends.
vote up1