New Post
Search
Help[Opinions] Lark numbers
in reply to a message by abbasdaughter
These are the number of babies born, not the rank or anything
1880: both less than 5
1890: both less than 5
1900: both less than 5
1910: both less than 5
1920: M7, F less than 5
1930: M6, F less than 5
1940: both less than 5
1950: M less than 5, F67
1960: M5, F24
1970: M5, F22
1980: M less than 5, F13
1990: M less than 5, F9
2000: M less than 5, F13
2010: M less than 5, F26
Soo...seems like a pretty obscure name either way. Something must have happened in the forties to get it associated with female-ness.
Upon further examination, it stayed negligibly low throughout the forties and then suddenly leapt to 67 in 1949. I wonder what it was!
1880: both less than 5
1890: both less than 5
1900: both less than 5
1910: both less than 5
1920: M7, F less than 5
1930: M6, F less than 5
1940: both less than 5
1950: M less than 5, F67
1960: M5, F24
1970: M5, F22
1980: M less than 5, F13
1990: M less than 5, F9
2000: M less than 5, F13
2010: M less than 5, F26
Soo...seems like a pretty obscure name either way. Something must have happened in the forties to get it associated with female-ness.
Upon further examination, it stayed negligibly low throughout the forties and then suddenly leapt to 67 in 1949. I wonder what it was!
This message was edited 12/6/2011, 11:27 PM
Archived Thread - replies disabled
1