View Message

[Opinions] Hunter or Indigo?
for a boy. Not a real child, so don't tell me about trendiness or popularity, etc. Just pick one. Go. :)
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Replies

Indigo!Hunter is so violent, I've never been a fan. Where as Indigo nn Indy is awesome.
vote up1
I like both but prefer Indigo:)
vote up1
Indigo!The more I say it, the more I like it. It's neat. :D
vote up1
Indigo, no contest! I really dig it.f
vote up1
Hunter
vote up1
Hunter. I think that Indigo sounds more like a girls name
vote up1
Indigo
vote up1
Indigo.It's so much nicer, and Hunter only makes me think of hunting, which is obviously not good.I also dislike the way Hunter sounds. Indigo seems to flow a little more.

This message was edited 2/20/2010, 4:00 PM

vote up1
IndigoI dislike names like Hunter, Gunner, Archer, etc.
vote up1
Hunter!
vote up1
Indigo, it's more interesting than Hunter. I find Hunter unattractive even for a fantasy or fictional boy.
vote up1
Hunter. I prefer Indigo for a girl.
vote up1
IndigoI hate the name Hunter with a passion. Its just so violent sounding and such an unpleasant thing to name a child for. Indigo is kind of boho-cool. Its soft but edgy...I actually like it a whole lot for a boy.
vote up1
Hunter
vote up1
Indigo. I like the sound and the feel, and it's a cool color :P and Hunter is a bit bleah / bland sounding. Indigo would be a cool and interesting person; Hunter would be an average, mean-ish sort of person.
vote up1
Hunter. Neither is my style, but Indigo is too hippy for me. Hunter is at least a real name, originally a last name, but still a name.
vote up1